RE: developer-level changes Silva 1.2
"Benno Luthiger" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.silva.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000201c519b8$3254eaf0$1e238481@openlu> |
Hello
> * instead of 2 scripts 'render_view' and 'render_preview' only
> 'render' is called for both view and preview, if you want to
> make a distinction between the two, you can register a new
> view_type called 'preview' to another subdirectory and place a
> 'render' script in that, the general pattern is that if you want
> to use only 1 script you place it directly in the
> 'public/<meta_type>' directory, if you want to have seperate
> scripts for view and preview, create a 'view' and 'preview'
> directory in that dir ('public/<meta_type>/view' and
> 'public/<meta_type>/preview')
For Silva extension developers this means that they have to register the
public view for their object under ['public', 'MyObject', 'view'] instead of
['public', 'MyObject'], i.e.
reg.register('public', 'My Object Version', ['public', 'MyObject', 'view'])
and to register a preview in addition, i.e.
reg.register('preview', 'My Object Version', ['public', 'MyObject',
'preview'])
Is this correct?
Benno
> -----Original Message-----
> From: silva-dev-bounces-IAPFreCvJWM6s/[email protected]
> [mailto:silva-dev-bounces-IAPFreCvJWM6s/[email protected]]On Behalf Of
> Martijn Faassen
> Sent: Montag, 24. Januar 2005 15:52
> To: silva-dev-IAPFreCvJWM6s/[email protected]
> Subject: [silva-dev] developer-level changes Silva 1.2
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> This is the developer-level changes document for Silva 1.2,
> describing
> differences from Silva 1.1 and earlier versions:
>
> From 1.1 to 1.2:
>
> * the 'action_paste' and 'action_paste_to_ghost' methods on
> Folder have
> a new signature, instead of returning a list of messages it now
> returns (message_type, messages) where message_type can be
> 'feedback'
> and 'error' and messages is the list that used to be returned.
>
> * tab_edit for VersionedContent views has changed to make use of a new
> macro, ``macro_tab_edit/macros/editor``, instead of
> ``macro_index/macros/master`` directly. ``macro_tab_edit`` does use
> ``macro_index`` indirectly.
>
> A default tab_edit is supplied in VersionedContent views.
> SilvaDocument however overrides this with its own tab_edit.
> You can also do in your own product.
>
> The following slots are available in
> ``macro_tab_edit/macros/editor``:
>
> * editor_css - add in editor-specific CSS stylesheets.
>
> * editor_refresher - a slot to put in special refreshing code for
> editors that are sensitive to Zope session timeouts,
> such as the
> forms editor.
>
> * editor_selection - add extra fields above the main
> editor content
> area to allow the user to switch editors, such as
> between kupu and
> the forms editor.
>
> * editor_content - the main editor content area, showing for
> instance the forms editor or kupu.
>
> * The public view directory layout changed due to some change
> in the way
> we register views. For some functionality on the
> VersionManagementAdapter, we needed to get a rendered
> version, which
> wasn't allowed the way the views were previously set up
> (fetching the
> version happened in the render scripts, each script would render a
> specific version).
>
> Changes:
>
> * instead of registering a 'public' view for VersionedContent
> objects, they are now registered for Version objects, the view
> assumes
>
> * instead of 2 scripts 'render_view' and 'render_preview' only
> 'render' is called for both view and preview, if you want to
> make a distinction between the two, you can register a new
> view_type called 'preview' to another subdirectory and place a
> 'render' script in that, the general pattern is that
> if you want
> to use only 1 script you place it directly in the
> 'public/<meta_type>' directory, if you want to have seperate
> scripts for view and preview, create a 'view' and 'preview'
> directory in that dir ('public/<meta_type>/view' and
> 'public/<meta_type>/preview')
>
> * the 'model' variable in the render script does not point to the
> VersionedContent object anymore, but instead it refers to the
> Version object (of course it still refers to the object itself
> in case the object is not of a versioned type)
>
> Let us know if anything is unclear!
>
> Regards,
>
> Martijn
>
> _______________________________________________
> silva-dev mailing list
> silva-dev-IAPFreCvJWM6s/[email protected]
> http://lists.infrae.com/mailman/listinfo/silva-dev
>