Re: A Problem

>In this way "wrapper" would stay exactly "as is".

It needs to, just not the scripts it is calling. I will come up with 
something once the time comes.

>Would that work? I haven't look at mailman internals for a long time. It 
>used to be that it "locked" the database, which would mean Zope would have 
>to acquire and release a lock on every transaction. Maybe this isn't there 
>anymore? I'll try to dig into this a bit today.

Well, actually we will have not to do anything, since Mailman will handle 
all that itself! And once we are saving the objects in the ZODB in version 
2.0, then we throw all the locking code away, since the ZODB will handle it.

Regards,
Stephan

--
Stephan Richter
CBU - Physics and Chemistry Student
Web2k - Web Design/Development & Technical Project Management