ZEO vs NEO
Jim Fulton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zodb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPDm-Fh=oxKPtSRLXvBOqwA+aVfeXToADViH2F2KJ3h3P2o37w@mail.gmail.com> |
I really like the NEO architecture, at least at a high level. I haven't studied it in detail. I've been planning to work toward a similar architecture with ZEO. A big stumbling block for me has been NEO's GPL license. I was speaking with Jean-Paul Smets the other day and we discussed adjusting NEO's license to make it more broadly usable. He suggested making the client LGPL. Hypothetically, If NEO eventually replaced ZEO and had an LGPL license, would the LGPL license present a problem for anyone? If the LGPL isn't a problem, I'd put a lot more effort into looking at NEO as a client-server architecture for ZODB, likely as a replacement for ZEO. So does the LGPL present a problem to anyone? Jim -- Jim Fulton http://jimfulton.info -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.