Re: Re: skin support for xmlrpc

On 9/14/07, Christian Zagrodnick <[email protected]> wrote:
> Before I'll revert the layer-support will be there in a third party
> package, probably using ++api++.

Better to be specific than general when it's for a specific type of
request; why not ++xmlrpc++?

Unless ++api++ is for more than XML-RPC support; perhaps it should be
for IHTTPRequest?

I'd actually rather avoid a proliferation of ++namespace++ usages
myself, and prefer ++api++ for IHTTPRequest.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fdrake at gmail.com>
"Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller