Re: Re: skin support for xmlrpc
Christian Theune <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3 |
|---|---|
| Organization | gocept gmbh & co. kg |
| Message-ID | <1189755345.6195.0.camel@mindy> |
Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 02:49 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake: > On 9/14/07, Christian Zagrodnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > Before I'll revert the layer-support will be there in a third party > > package, probably using ++api++. > > Better to be specific than general when it's for a specific type of > request; why not ++xmlrpc++? > > Unless ++api++ is for more than XML-RPC support; perhaps it should be > for IHTTPRequest? > > I'd actually rather avoid a proliferation of ++namespace++ usages > myself, and prefer ++api++ for IHTTPRequest. +1 -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany www.gocept.com - [email protected] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBG6jnRdUt9X/gknwIRAiyLAJ9oh1wn+iHMk+69qDkIpnRYoALhlQCg1ILv b0i05rLiVprXyyAkVTS230U= =xiDE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----