Re: Known-good-sets problem

Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
>> Let me make the case for bug-for-bug compatibility:
> 
> I assume by this you mean setting fixed versions.

Yes.

[snip]
> I'm not suggesting that setting fixed versions is a bad idea.  I think 
> some projects may choose to go this way.  This is a valid policy 
> decision.  Other developers would, IMO, benefit from having a relatively 
> stable index as a source of new packages.  I don't think this is an 
> either-or decision.

I agree it isn't. I just wanted to make the case be heard in this 
discussion in case people hadn't seen the arguments yet.

Regards,

Martijn