Re: assertion error "PRI(owl) >= priority" otp.c line 248

"Matthew D. Fuller" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.ctwm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:08:25AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Stefan Monnier, and lo! it spake thus:
> > Actually, what we obviously need to do is get rid of TwmWindow
> > structs wholesale, just embed SQLite, and store our runtime data
> > there; then the indexes will find them for us!
> 
> I don't follow.  Wouldn't a hash-table work just as well?  SQLite
> seems like a rather expensive way to implement a hash-table.

I mean, I'm actually assuming an _array_ would work better than
either.  But if I can't dream up insane anti-solutions that would
_technically_ work, what's the point of weekends anyway?


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  [email protected]
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.