Re: assertion error "PRI(owl) >= priority" otp.c line 248
Stefan Monnier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.ctwm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I mean, I'm actually assuming an _array_ would work better than
> either. But if I can't dream up insane anti-solutions that would
> _technically_ work, what's the point of weekends anyway?
Good point. This said, the current way windows and turned into
TwmWindow structs has been "efficient enough" for several decades (for
me anyway, and I routinely have 200-300 windows), and AFAIK hardware
resources are not depleting yet (even though single thread performance
has stopped improving), so I think there's no hurry to improve this ;-)
Stefan