Re: FVWM History (to all those left): domivogt, miso, despen, etc...

On 7/21/26 13:19, Thomas Adam wrote:
> [...]
>
> Interestingly, I don't think fvwm is dead, but with the "threat" of
> Wayland, users of such systems are looking for alternatives.  As I say
> though, FVWM isn't dead. but I would love to hear more from
> people/developers on this.

I have had an idea bouncing around in my head these past few days:  
Wayland is, as I understand, built on the DRI layer originally intended 
for accelerating OpenGL under X11.  The X server already has the ability 
to listen on multiple transports. How hard would it be to add Wayland 
support to the X server? (Make the X server function as a Wayland 
compositor?)

If the X server were to gain Wayland compositing, we could have Wayland 
clients in an FVWM session...


-- Jacob