Re: IceWM v1.2 vs v1.3

On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 14:43 +0100, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> 
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm the Fedora and RHEL/CentOS IceWM maintainer.
> > Currently, both Fedora and RHEL/CentOS ship icewm 1.2.37 and I'm
> > thinking about pushing icewm 1.3.7 as a Fedora 15 feature.
> >
> > 1. Is 1.3.7 considered stable?
> > 2. What are the user visible changes in v1.3.7? (I could only find this
> > [1])
> 
> 1.3 is still considered more or less development, but it is here already 
> from 2008. It's main purpose was to start fixing bugs that had high 
> probability of breaking something or that needed some major changes in 
> code to get fixed (same for RFEs). I think, there are also some changes in 
> library dependencies, but I may be wrong.

OK.
I'll free some time get 1.3 in -devel (Fedora's development branch) and
if I won't see any increase in the number of bugs, I'll push it to
Fedora and RHEL.

Thanks for the answer,
Gilboa



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d