Re: What distros provide a default IceWM environment?

"David Iannucci" <[email protected]> Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:59:58 -1000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.window-managers.icewm.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>  I hesitate to step in here, because suggesting a different term is
>  wont to lead to flamewars that make vi/emacs seem like a minor
>  disagreement ;)  But, have you considered rxvt-unicode ?

No problem, as long as it's ok if I defend my choice :-) I have,
actually, tried it (and @Duke - also pretty sure I've tried eterm as
well). Neither of them "worked" for me.  I can remember rxvt better as
it was more recent. It was ok... I could live with it in a pinch, but
just not... quite... there... IIRC, it wasn't as keyboardable as
Konsole... e.g. in the latter I can rotate through tabs with <shift-
left/rightarrow>, which is extremely natural and convenient. I seem to
recall that I had to use the pgup/pgdn keys in rxvt. Yealch. Bad enough
I have to do that in Firefox :-(

And I like my tabs at the top, which I don't think rxvt allows... and I
can move a tab's position with <ctrl-shift-arrow> in Konsole, which I
don't think was possible at all.  And I don't think it allowed my
transparency eye-candy. IIRC, eterm was even less functional than this
(looking at the screenshots on its site, it doesn't even seem to have
tabs, which is a dealbreaker for me).

So, bottom line.... my terminal is Konsole. Sorry if I'm unfairly remem-
bering my experience with rxvt wrongly... but I do remember clearly that
I liked it less than Konsole :-)

>  I can remember using konsole from kde3, but I gave that up when I
>  moved to using UTF-8 (the font handling in other kde3 progs,
>  particularly konqueror, was a pain : typically, set a font and then

You won't find me defending konq... and truthfully I *have* had some
trouble with UTF-8 (non-ASCII) chars in Konsole, but it has never been
something I really need, so it's a non-issue.  Except that I'm lately
doing some text work in vim with Japanese, and for that purpose I have a
Konsole that gets called with LC_CTYPE="ja_JP.UTF8", and it works fine
for me.  Go figure.

>  Also, a transparent background is anathema to me - my windows overlap
>  (my xorg screen is only 1600x1200),

*Only*?  I regularly work, lately, in 1024x768 :-) (not out of choice or
preference, I can assure you...)

> I'd never be able to read the text if the background text showed
> through, so I haven't tested if that part still works.

It seems you haven't use transparency much at all :-D ... in my
experience, transparent windows in Xorg (at least - can't speak for MS
Win) never show "underlapped" windows... the background that shows
through is always just the root window image, no matter what's
underneath.... for exactly the reason you say -- it'd be useless
otherwise (or, could this be a feature of KDE rather than Xorg? Hard to
imagine). If you choose your root image well and set transparency to a
dark enough level, it's quite nice :-)

>  Myself, I *only* use Xft fonts (e.g. ttf fonts - unlike the author/
>  maintainer of urxvt) and I've got it configured in .Xresources with -

Hmmm... this is potentially of interest to me. Are you saying that
rxvt allows *proportionally spaced* fonts?  Or am I inappropriately
conflating TTF as a technology with the orthogonal property of font
spacing-ness?

>  I'm tempted to say that almost everyone uses gdk-pixbuf these days,
>  but since you're using such an old kde that might not be true for you
>  - probably, even older versions of gtk+-2 will fulfil that
>    dependency.

I'm not sure, but... I wouldn't expect KDE to use gtk-anything... no?

> ĸen [ or, 'ken', if you can't render the first version ]

Looks like a small-cap K, so I guess it renders :-)

Dave

p.s. Sorry to the list... got a bit OT from icewm, but... this list has
     low enough volume to bear it, I think :-)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
IceWM-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icewm-user