Re: IDEA: IceDE (lightweight LXDE competitor)
"J. Bakshi" <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:08:03 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.icewm.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:00:23 -0500 Jason Hsu <[email protected]> wrote: > How many (or few) people work on IceWM? How small is the JWM team? How many people work on KDE, GNOME, Xfce, and LXDE? > > I was under the impression that IceWM is better supported than JWM. IceWM has its own dedicated domain name, more documentation, and this mailing list. JWM does not have its own dedicated domain name, has less documentation, and doesn't have a forum or mailing list. > > The more I think about it, the more I think more of us need to join the IceWM development team. I can't take over the lead role (as I have my hands full running Swift Linux, and I'm STILL working on the first Mint-based release), but I'd be glad to contribute to the team. > Hello Jason, The main point is interest and awareness. IceWM is showing its capacity where KDE and GNOME fail. I was a fond of KDE and often experimenting between GNOME and KDE to understand which one is better. Finally I found IceWM and since then I have never looked back. One can find my notes at http://jbakshi.50webs.com/linuxproject.html IceWM+idesk is a great combination. Though people see hope in JWM; the reason I think is slow development or no development at all. We need side by side a good GUI configuration for IceWM. Not asking for a qt based but just a gtk/gtk2 based lightweight tool. Users should get the easiness. IceWM is very fast and highly configurable but if you need hours to find out its configuration, how much comfortable do you feel ? I am still using IceWM since last couple of years that's why I am mentioning all these points in hope we get more matured S/W JWM supports transparent panel... so visual appeal is good... rich icon sets..and some more little titbits which still play a good role to make it attractive. We need more useful applet for IceWM. So repeating Jason's voice.... we need more developers. IceWM exist in the earth since long. Rather than reinventing the wheel, why don't we make the existing better ? Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure