Re: Various troubles, firstly icewmbg
Adam Pribyl <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:38:52 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.window-managers.icewm.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Dave wrote: >> You happened to leave out the environment upon which you are running >> IceWM, and whether you have used that environment's precompiled >> packages or built it yourself. This is important, as IceWM may not >> have been built with support for imlib, without which it is limited to >> loading xpm-format images, and cannot load png, jpg, et alia. > > Thank you for the replies, gentlemen. I am also running Gentoo, with > icewm out of portage (1.3.7-r1). I don't know if it's been built with > imlib, because there is no USE flag for that, but I have imlib and > imlib2 installed on the system. Also forgot to mention that I'm doing > dual-display and have USE="xinerama" (nice to be able to say this to > someone who understands it :=) Xorg-server is at 1.15.0 (latest stable). I do not use xinerama.. do not have a space on table for more monitors :). >> Using IceWM on X, just start "xinit" then in plain xterm window start >> "icewm-session". icewmbg sets my background without a problem. > > I am starting X with "startx", and exec'ing icewm-session in my > .xinitrc. OK, this was just and example how to test "pure" icewm without any additional garbage. >> Both the Fedora distribution one and myself compiled with default >> options. Not using transparency, but as usually, this is a matter of >> application, not a WM. The terms that do transparency most often use >> so called "pseudo transparency" - i.e. you see a background but not a >> windows beneath. Full transparency IMHO needs composition manager. > > Aha! Finally I understand what is meant by pseudotransparency! This is > what I want! Of course I don't want to see other windows underneath.... > does anyone, really? This is after all just eye candy... and seeing > other windows would be far too disruptive to the eye. So.... this means > I don't need xcompmgr and transset-df?? Just use application settings to > achieve the transparency? For terminal transparency you do not need this. Just tried aterm -name aterm -title 'Terminal' -sl 3000 -tr +sb -si -sk -fade 70 -sh 60 -fn -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-c-*-iso8859-2 -g 130x50+20-0 -fg \#cecece and it works. > If it's a matter of the application, I guess I have to reconsider the > old Konsole (KDE3.5 version) that I use and love. I guess I should try > the newest Konsole (last one I tried was probably @ v4.3 or so, and I > didn't like it, but it's probably better by now). I do not know how konsole is configurable, but it could happen that it needs the kwin compositor. Or is there a setting for "pseudotransparency"? > Dave Adam Pribyl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/