Re: Funny loop with post-increment.

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:57:31 +0200, Brady Kelly <[email protected]>
wrote:

>> Since terminology seems to be important here: it *was*
>> post-incremented. You just didn't keep the post-incremented value.
>
> It would be very presumptuous to think something like terminology would
> not enjoy a very high ranking on a list such as this ;-)

Maybe something was lost in translation; I'm not a native English speaker. I
meant terminology as in "the technical or special terms used in a business,
art, science, or special subject".

But I still think the *real* confusion here was which i you were actually
incrementing. If you had asked for 2 volunteers, named one "i", and the
other "1", and then acted the original loop out using real people, I think
the whole matter would have been perfectly clear. ;]

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com