Re: Funny loop with post-increment.

On Feb 19, 2008 7:53 PM, Per Bolmstedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:57:31 +0200, Brady Kelly <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >> Since terminology seems to be important here: it *was*
> >> post-incremented. You just didn't keep the post-incremented value.
> >
> > It would be very presumptuous to think something like terminology would
> > not enjoy a very high ranking on a list such as this ;-)
>
> Maybe something was lost in translation; I'm not a native English speaker. I
> meant terminology as in "the technical or special terms used in a business,
> art, science, or special subject".
>
> But I still think the *real* confusion here was which i you were actually
> incrementing. If you had asked for 2 volunteers, named one "i", and the
> other "1", and then acted the original loop out using real people, I think
> the whole matter would have been perfectly clear. ;]

LOL.

That made me laugh. I hope I am not the only person who just stood up
in their office and tried to act out the assignment of "i" to "1" on
their own. Suffice to say, I had difficulty ...

--
http://lets.coozi.com.au/

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com