Re: Once again - Object of type x...

Only if they need to be used at design-time. Otherwise simply stop using
them at design-time based on the this.DesignMode checks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion relating to the specifics of the C# and Managed C++
> languages [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter
> Osucha
> Sent: 18 December 2006 21:16
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CX] Once again - Object of type x...
> 
> OK.  So the 'nested' user controls - although the concept still seems
a
> bit
> strange - is not necessarily a bad idea.  However, the classes those
> controls use ought to be split out to a separate project.
> 
> Peter
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Discussion relating to the specifics of the C# and
> > Managed C++ languages [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of Chris Anderson
> > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 3:36 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CX] Once again - Object of type x...
> >
> > > > This is the generally recommended approach.
> > > > If you get into a habit of checking this.DesignMode it
> > stops a lot
> > > > of unexpected problems (and helps to stop the IDE feeling
> > sluggish
> > > > as it runs runtime code (possibly trying to access
> > databases, etc!))
> > >
> > > How will this (or better yet, will it at all) help the
> > situation where
> > > the project has 'nested' controls?
> >
> > The "in-design" usercontrols and their nested controls will
> > not be communicating with each other (at least they will not
> > be passing user classes between each other) because that code
> > will be hidden behind a check for DesignMode and will
> > therefore not be executed.
> >
> > Chris
> 
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r)  http://www.develop.com
> 
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com
> 

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com