Re:
Kolby R Kappes <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:42:48 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.jobs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004701c32c74$92f71280$6501a8c0@synetdev1> |
We've been seeing them as useful in getting a client to look at a candidate, but since the clients aren't offering to pay more if someone is certified, we certainly aren't either. I will say that they do get my attention, especially someone that already has several of the .NET tests under their belt. It at least makes me take a 2nd look at the resume. -krk Kolby R Kappes, PMP [email protected] 614-226-5727 Synet Systems www.synetsystems.com "We Make the Web Work!" -----Original Message----- From: Unmoderated DOTNET job forum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Andre Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-JOBS] Well, as an MCSD I have found it helps with the interview process and that is it. I have decided not to 're-up' my cert for .Net as I just don't see it as being worth it (too much cost for too little benefit), especially with a senior .Net lead developer in NYC only being offered $50,000. Best wishes to all, John -----Original Message----- From: Unmoderated DOTNET job forum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry O'Brien Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DOTNET-JOBS] > "To me, the overall market seems to be moving towards inexpensive > incompetence: under-specified, under-bid, and under-delivered > projects. But the monthly bill is less!" > > > Absolutely...and about a year from now there will be a lot of jobs > open in order to fix the "work" done by these scrubs today. True, but will the "fixes" be done by what Tom called "artisanal" programmers? For that matter, if the scrubs say "This is what is known as iterative and incremental development, you got something out there fast and cheap, it doesn't quite meet your needs, and now we modify it," what will you argue? Scrubs modifying sloppy code will eventually become bogged down (probably), but not for several iterations of their sloppiness. And, as a good programmer, you will probably be _more_ pessimistic than the scrubs if you're up to bid for the fixing job: they'll say "Oh, we can change that," and you'll say "It's a complete mess and to prepare for the future, you should refactor the whole thing." These thoughts are making me reconsider my long-held viewpoint that certifications are a waste. Any MCADs or MCSDs on the list care to share their cost-benefit analyses?