Re: Illegal / Legal Questions (was RE: .Net Job in Chicago)
Ed Mathias <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Jun 2003 14:38:51 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.jobs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTSERV%[email protected]> |
This discussion raises something I've always found interesting regarding the treatment of Visa workers in the United States. I was an expatriate programmer in Western Europe for a few years. During this time, I observed several debates within various contries regarding the necessity of restricting of worker visas due to local unemployment. At no time in any of these discussion were questions of discrimination, xenophobia, or any similar categorizations raised. The prevailing attitude was that of "assuring opportunities were offered to your own citizens first". It was not (I mean NEVER) questioned other than for reasons of economic impact. In short, they protected their job markets for their own residents far, far more agressively than the U.S. does and are unapologetic about it. They seem to feel it was their duty. Whenever the possibility of restricting visas is raised in the United States, it is usually followed by a "full body convulsion" from several quarters with all the aforementioned discriminatory accusations. And judging by the tech unemployment rate for 40+ workers, we've certainly got as many job protection issues as anybody else. Studies have shown the 40+ worker is the category that seems to be most heavily impacted by guest workers. I guess the question I'm posing here is, Is restricting Visas in order to "protect your own" bad for any country, or is the U.S. being held to a different and unfair standard than others? BTW. This is the liveliest the job board has been for months, perhaps ever. Might as well do this, it sure doesn't get many job postings.