Re: java serialization alternative
Randall R Schulz <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:16:09 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.java.advanced |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 04 April 2008 09:59, Bob Lee wrote: > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Randall R Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > > > > ... Threading according to subject is _wrong_. > > Look, I'm no expert, but it seems to me that I should be able to > reply to another email and start a new thread. If the standard > doesn't allow for that, it's broken. The standard isn't the issue. The standard is fine. It's the mail client software that's broken. > The sending email client could > just drop the message ID when you change the subject, or the > receiving client could use a combination of message IDs and subject > lines to handle threads. If MUA software stripped the In-Reply-To header when you changed the subject, it would be impossible to change the subject _without_ creating a new thread, but doing that _is_ legitimate. > I guess I can't relate--Gmail handles threads beautifully. Not if it caters to this practice. I cannot really condone the mindless use of email that is so prevalent. Thread Hijacking (the practice you suggested) is just one aspect of this mental sloth. > Bob Randall Schulz =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com