Re: 0.4.0pre16

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:41:53PM -0800, Alex Russell wrote:
> ...
> You aren't missing much, but we do have several larger applications 
> under the belt which have helped to inform requirements and drive 
> stability. As for widespread adoption, I think you'll find that all 
> of the available DHTML toolkits suffer to some extent from this 

Seems to me that part of the problem is that the big value of netWindows
is under the hood, things that most DHTML users won't realize/find out
since they tend to look for specific widgets and don't have a whole lot
of background in software development.

And as far as specific widgets go, netWindows has a nice collection but
for each widget you can probably find a standalone equivalent that does
more, has more bells and whistles.  So I can see why this would be a hard
sell.

Regards,

Dror

-- 
Dror Matalon
Zapatec Inc 
1700 MLK Way
Berkeley, CA 94709
http://www.zapatec.com

_______________________________________________
The netWindows developers list: [email protected]
http://netwindows.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_netwindows.org