Re: 0.4.0pre16
Alex Russell <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Nov 2004 07:57:48 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.netwindows |
|---|---|
| Organization | dojotoolkit.org |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 11 November 2004 12:02 pm, Dror Matalon wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:41:53PM -0800, Alex Russell wrote: > > ... > > You aren't missing much, but we do have several larger > > applications under the belt which have helped to inform > > requirements and drive stability. As for widespread adoption, I > > think you'll find that all of the available DHTML toolkits suffer > > to some extent from this > > Seems to me that part of the problem is that the big value of > netWindows is under the hood, things that most DHTML users won't > realize/find out since they tend to look for specific widgets and > don't have a whole lot of background in software development. That's a good way to put it. I'm constantly suprised at how often NW=20 gets into a site or product and then someone asks "how do I..." and=20 the answer is "well, you can just use this builtin thinger from=20 netWindows...". > And as far as specific widgets go, netWindows has a nice collection > but for each widget you can probably find a standalone equivalent > that does more, has more bells and whistles. So I can see why this > would be a hard sell. Right. One of the biggest problems with widget development is the=20 sheer amount of mind-numbing detail work. I, for one, am not a=20 graphic designer. Combine that with performance constraints of=20 working in the browser and a general lack of developers who "get" UI=20 engineering (let alone UI engineering in a browser context), and=20 you've got a recipe for medieocrity. nW currently has several "killer=20 widgets", but they're only "killer" because someone funded my=20 development time and provided both requirements and a user base. That=20 combination is much more likely to produce great components than a=20 vacuum of those drivers would. OTOH, I do think that producing=20 capable "plumbing" is something that the open source side of things=20 succeeds at. It's funny that way: it's almost our own microcosom of=20 the tradeoffs and pressures that formed Mac OS X. Regards =2D --=20 Alex Russell [email protected] [email protected] F687 1964 1EF6 453E 9BD0 5148 A15D 1D43 AB92 9A46 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBmNH8oV0dQ6uSmkYRAr2wAJ924dD2kLwFEV8QIxRcnsxRsMkiBwCfXi6u GRfB05+sr1an5yhjlPp0u1g=3D =3Dvm8I =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ The netWindows developers list: [email protected] http://netwindows.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_netwindows.org