Re: soap encoding
Jonathan Stowe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.soap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Matt Long wrote: > Rosimildo wrote: > > > --- Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yep. > > > > > > I was looking for doc/encoded or rpc/literal > > > > > > I believe that in reality, these two are > > NEVER going to be used anywhere, except > > someone proving that they exist. > > > > > I can't imagine a case whereby doc/encoded | rpc/lit become a norm. > Only doc/lit + rpc/encoded have been tested on an interop basis, i.e., > the focus of vendors and/or other interested parties. > If I divine the meaning correctly I believe we are infact using an RPC/Literal scheme in an application whereby a BizTalk server formats an XML document from some flat file data and then places this in a SOAP envelope which is then sent via HTTP to a SOAP::Lite proxy which handles it as an RPC, of course you could say that this is just a different way of creating an RPC/Encoded envelope or alternatively I may have totally the wrong idea what RPC/Literal really is :) /J\ -- Jonathan Stowe | <http://www.gellyfish.com> | This space for rent | You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.