Re: customized encoding and SOAP interoperability
Soumen Sarkar <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:01:26 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.soap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Customized encoding means you have compromised SOAP interoperability. Is there any reason not to expect so? To foster interoperability you may document well your encoding methods, have readily available implementation and be ready to share it with business partners. Soumen Sarkar. -----Original Message----- From: Neela Lakshminarayan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [SOAP] customized encoding and SOAP interoperability We have a client communitcating with a Java Servlet through SOAP messages. The SOAP implementation is our own but it does conform to the SOAP specification. Since our response can be very verbose, we decided to compress our messages. For certain reasons, we are unable to use the standard encoding methods such as gZip, deflate, compress etc. We have a customized encoding. We don't like deviating from standards but in this case we had to. My question is - by using a customized encoding, have we terribly compromised SOAP interoperability? Is customized encoding a terrible thing to do? Currently we don't care about being interoperable with other SOAP toolkits - but the requirement might change in the future. Thanks, Neela You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.