Re: SOAP Errors
Marty Burns <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:46:46 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.devel.soap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think it is advisable that security protocol failures are silently discarded so as not to provide a potential intruder of useful information/feedback. However, it is useful to send an out of band message to the administrator of the security infrastructure of the failure so that an audit trail is produced. Marty -----Original Message----- From: Discussion of implementing SOAP applications today [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Paul Faulkner Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [SOAP] SOAP Errors What is the SOAP standard for handling errors. Let say I implement PKI security for my SOAP Web Service and someone sends a message that fails security. Do I reply with an error letting them know this or simply discard the message? Obviously both have merits and pitfalls. The biggest concern I have is someone flooding my webservice with invalid requests and having to reply to each request. What is the industry standard for these situations? You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the SOAP archive, unsubscribe from SOAP, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.