Re: Path-related asserts

You clearly wouldn't want to do this all the time since case is
significant on many directory systems. I could be missing your point.

-Kelly

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Daniel M. Pomerantz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I was thinking about this a little bit, and I came up with a suggestion:
>
>  Any assert that is based on tests, allow a parameter to them "bool
>  ignoreCase" which is passed into the String.Compare().  Users of these
>  asserts can do what they feel is best.  For instance, you could do your
>  test of Path.DirectorySeperator, and I could always tell it to ignore case.
>
>  You can also include overloads of those asserts which omit that
>  parameter, just like String.Compare does.  If the parameter is omitted
>  either always ignore case, or never omit case.  Do not base it on the
>  OS, since as discussed it is not OS dependant.  I am in favour of always
>  ignoring case, but I could see either way.  Whichever, this will provide
>  some consistancy.  Whatdya say?
>
>  dmp
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/