Re: Fwd: Fwd: Assume
"Kelly Anderson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.dotnet.nunit.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Daniel M. Pomerantz <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Charlie. I'm not really in need of this feature, and whether the > test never shows up or shows up as not run is not too important to me. > I would think showing up as not run would be more ideal, but again, not > my request. I'm just trying to suggest ways to implement it. As for > Assumption not meaning what it should mean, I'm fine with changing the > name. I think Kelly only picked the name because of the theory > document. I prefer something built on the idea of "Conditional," but I > am really ambivalent here. Just trying to forward ideas. Yup. I used Assume just because that's what it was called in the Theory paper, and I thought it would be confusing to our discussion to change the term. I would prefer something else if only for the auto completion difference... -Kelly ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/