Re: Fwd: Fwd: Assume

Hi Daniel, 

> Thanks Charlie.  I'm not really in need of this feature, and 
> whether the test never shows up or shows up as not run is not 
> too important to me.  
> I would think showing up as not run would be more ideal, but 
> again, not my request.  I'm just trying to suggest ways to 
> implement it.  As for Assumption not meaning what it should 
> mean, I'm fine with changing the name.  I think Kelly only 
> picked the name because of the theory document.  I prefer 
> something built on the idea of "Conditional," but I am really 
> ambivalent here.  Just trying to forward ideas.

I think it (again) depends on what it's being used for.

If the idea is to automatically generate a few hundred random
numbers to feed to a test, I wouldn't want the gui to list
the tests for numbers that were never used as not run. I'd
want the tests to never have been generate in the first place.

But in other situations, it might make sense to show the
skipped test.


Charlie



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/