Re: Speed
Mike <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.off-topic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Since I've been dogging Silverlight, I'll mention that this guy's site is kind of impressive, slick yet not annoying: http://jeffblankenburg.com/default.aspx Seems like he might be worth reading as well. Though right now I'm still almost as pessimistic about MS as Eckel: http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=262565 Mike On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'll send your list to Ballmer. :) > > I appreciate that. :) But...thousands of programmers hitching their > development wagon to the whims of one single business man seems just wrong > these days. > > Mike > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Brad Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> I'll send your list to Ballmer. :) >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Just make it faster please. What of any interest has been added since >>> 2003? >>> >>> Everything new added to C# was already better in JavaScript and other >>> languages, and while things like generics are good, they are so very noisy >>> and ugly in C#. Everything new added to ASP.NET <http://asp.net/> was >>> overshadowed by Ajax. Everything new added to VS was overshadowed by >>> ReSharper and others. >>> >>> Some new things are good. The addition of F#, Ruby, and Python to the VS >>> world is exciting, though personally I'd give a much higher priority to >>> adding a little intellisense and refactoring support for JavaScript, since >>> that's what we have immediate need for. MVC is good. >>> >>> If you really want to give us new stuff, then give us something exciting, >>> like the iPhone! We want a way to send our own ideas out into the mobile >>> world, and maybe even make some coin. >>> >>> And just get rid of IE, entirely. I'm serious, it's an active negative >>> for the entire planet. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Brad Wilson <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Make it faster" or "add new features"? >>>> >>>> Pick one. :) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Joe O'Leary <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Unfortunately VS2008 is a dog, even on fast machines, IMO. Worse >>>>> than 2005 which was worse than 2003. I really wish they would improve the >>>>> performance for once. If the new one is changing a lot, it is probably >>>>> going to be an even bigger dog >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> >From: Anna-Jayne Metcalfe <[email protected]> >>>>> >Sent: Jul 10, 2009 9:33 PM >>>>> >To: [email protected] >>>>> >Subject: RE: [OT] Speed >>>>> > >>>>> >Hi Mike, >>>>> > >>>>> >> Is Windows 7 going to be faster than XP? Is VS 2010 going to be >>>>> faster >>>>> >than the preceding versions? I'm seeing very positive reviews of >>>>> these new >>>>> >products, but nobody ever talks about speed, which is the only thing I >>>>> care >>>>> >about. >>>>> > >>>>> >If our testing is anything to go by, Win7 is comparable to XP in >>>>> performance >>>>> >and if other reports are accurate is certainly capable of running on a >>>>> >smaller footprint than Vista. It's certainly worth a look if you're >>>>> bringing >>>>> >in new machines (I'm not a fan of OS upgrades). >>>>> > >>>>> >VS2010 is another matter. The verdict is not yet in on the new WPF >>>>> based >>>>> >editor, but my gut feeling (and based on what I've seen from beta >>>>> >installations) I'd say that VS2010 is going to have a significantly >>>>> bigger >>>>> >footprint than VS2008, and the volume of change in this release may >>>>> have >>>>> >some consequences in the RTM. >>>>> > >>>>> >It has always seemed to me that Visual Studio releases follow a >>>>> two-step >>>>> >pattern - one release where they try to change too much (VS5, VS2002, >>>>> >VS2005) followed by which consolidates the changes of the previous >>>>> release >>>>> >(VS6, VS2003, VS2008). My instincts tell me that VS2010 may >>>>> (unfortunately) >>>>> >be in the former camp. The plus side of that is of course that the >>>>> next >>>>> >release after VS2010 - call it VS2012 for now - will probably be a >>>>> good one. >>>>> > >>>>> >I can't help with Silverlight etc. I'm afraid - I'm a native C++ dev. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >Cheers, >>>>> > >>>>> > Anna x >>>>> > >>>>> > http://www.riverblade.co.uk >>>>> > MSN IM: [email protected] (don't ask!) >>>>> > Twitterings: http://twitter.com/annajayne >>>>> > Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jalapenokitten/ >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >------------------------------------ >>>>> > >>>>> >Yahoo! Groups Links >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >