Re: Open Source Content Management System

take a look at n2cms.com




2010/8/5 Chris Tavares <cct-/[email protected]>

>
>
>  Have you also considered Umbraco[0]? I have heard some very good things
> about it, and large parts of www.asp.net run on it, so you know it can
> handle the load. It has the commercial support infrastructure on it as well,
> and from what I can tell a better underlying framework than DotNetNuke does
> (or did, last time I looked).
>
>
>
> They were also a sponsor of our latest Seattle codecamp, for what that’s
> worth.
>
>
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
> [0] http://umbraco.org
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Greg
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 05, 2010 6:18 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [OT] Open Source Content Management System
>
>
>
>
>
> We would like to use a CMS for our client facing website.
>
> We budgeted $$$ to purchase one.
>
> All of m y research and asking my community buds is pointing us to
> DotNetNuke: http://www.dotnetnuke.com/
>
> I have no experience with a CMS. Our goal is to make the content in our
> client facing site configurable so we do not have to ask our developers to
> do it for us and then wait for the next release. Nothing fancy, just the
> ability to store and load content dynamically.
>
> Anyone here have experience with DotNetNuke? Open Source is great, though
> we are willing to pay for a "retail" product if we need to.
>
> I see it's a MIT style license that requires attribution in our source
> code. I'm not a lawyer but it looks quite straightforward unlike the GPL
> licenses.
>
> Regarding security - we are concerned about contributors leaving backdoors
> in the code since it is open source. I don't see this as being an issue so
> long as we keep up with the latest patches.
>
> Should we be concerned with licensing and back doordoors in?
>
>
>
> 
>