Re: Open Source Content Management System
Martin Kulov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.off-topic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
or sitefinity.com which is not OSS/free though but a new 4.0 version is coming soon that is really amazing! 2010/9/10 Martin Kulov <[email protected]> > take a look at n2cms.com > > > > > 2010/8/5 Chris Tavares <cct-/[email protected]> > > >> >> Have you also considered Umbraco[0]? I have heard some very good things >> about it, and large parts of www.asp.net run on it, so you know it can >> handle the load. It has the commercial support infrastructure on it as well, >> and from what I can tell a better underlying framework than DotNetNuke does >> (or did, last time I looked). >> >> >> >> They were also a sponsor of our latest Seattle codecamp, for what that’s >> worth. >> >> >> >> -Chris >> >> >> >> [0] http://umbraco.org >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Greg >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 05, 2010 6:18 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [OT] Open Source Content Management System >> >> >> >> >> >> We would like to use a CMS for our client facing website. >> >> We budgeted $$$ to purchase one. >> >> All of m y research and asking my community buds is pointing us to >> DotNetNuke: http://www.dotnetnuke.com/ >> >> I have no experience with a CMS. Our goal is to make the content in our >> client facing site configurable so we do not have to ask our developers to >> do it for us and then wait for the next release. Nothing fancy, just the >> ability to store and load content dynamically. >> >> Anyone here have experience with DotNetNuke? Open Source is great, though >> we are willing to pay for a "retail" product if we need to. >> >> I see it's a MIT style license that requires attribution in our source >> code. I'm not a lawyer but it looks quite straightforward unlike the GPL >> licenses. >> >> Regarding security - we are concerned about contributors leaving backdoors >> in the code since it is open source. I don't see this as being an issue so >> long as we keep up with the latest patches. >> >> Should we be concerned with licensing and back doordoors in? >> >> >> >> >> > >