Re: Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?

Mike <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:43:34 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.off-topic
Message-ID <CALct8TH-CGnHNeB_vAnvKbHDptYqw=iQjSYPCeQ0-dPgkNk4DA@mail.gmail.com>
I happen to like the spare, texty look of Windows 8, which VS 2012
exemplifies.  Or at least, don't dislike it.  Am I the silent majority?
 Who knows.  Let's at least give it time.  And if it is indeed
significantly faster, then I don't care what it looks like, I'm happy!

Just about every server I go on has been set back to "classic mode".  If no
one ever pushed us, we'd still be running Windows 3.0, I'm sure.

Mike

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Chris Sells <csells-MTuqIxyGj3nAKuVPhbf8BAC/[email protected]>wrote:

> **
>
>
>  lol****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Philo Janus
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 7:27 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?****
>
>  ** **
>
>   ****
>
> I’m pretty sure Azure is a collection of WordPress plugins… [just kidding]
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chris Sells
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:03 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
>
>
> ****
>
> Essentially the client-side of the company (Windows and Office) likes C++,
> whereas the server-side of the company (ASP.NET) likes C#. I’m unsure
> about the cloud size (Azure).****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Curt
> Hagenlocher
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 6:48 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
> Wait, what? VS2012 does not have less managed code than VS2010.****
>
>  ****
>
> It's a mistake to think of Microsoft as monolithic with respect to
> something like this. There are large parts of the company with a heavy
> investment in C#, and that's simply not going to change. For that matter,
> the C# compiler is being rewritten from C++ to C#. To a great extent, the
> recent re-emphasis on C++ inside the company is being driven by Windows,
> which****
>
>  ****
>
> 1) is concerned about being able to run efficiently on low-power devices
> like phones and tablets.
> 2) was burnt badly by managed code in the Longhorn era****
>
>
>  ****
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Alan Baljeu <alanbaljeu-/[email protected]> wrote:
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> I should add that C# can be used to make COM components, and it's much
> easier with C# than C++ even if you are an experienced C++ developer.  ***
> *
>
>  ****
>
> Also, check the stats.  C++ is growing, not dying.  Even Microsoft has
> switched to C++ after going heavy .net.  VS2010 is slow because it was made
> in .net, and VS2012 is fast because it was made in C++.****
>
>  ****
>
> Alan Baljeu****
>
> * *****
>
> *From: Alan Baljeu <alanbaljeu-/[email protected]>*****
>
> *To:* "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:07:25 AM****
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
> C++ sense was never as good as C# IntelliSense.  I suggest looking at
> VisualAssist.****
>
>  ****
>
> Alan Baljeu****
>
>  ****
>
> *From: Stoyan Damov <[email protected]>*****
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:47:59 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
> One almost unrelated question, but this is the OT list, so :) Would
> Microsoft implement IntelliSense for C++ or this has already been done? I
> understand there aren't so many C++ developers these days (and I'm not an
> every day one either) but every now and then I have to create this or that
> COM component (yeah... :() and VS2010 drives me mad, especially since I'm
> so used to Resharper and IntelliJ Idea which both beat IntelliSense...
>
> Thanks,
> Stoyan****
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Philo Janus <[email protected]> wrote:*
> ***
>
>   ****
>
> The part that baffles me - fifteen years of software have shown us that
> Power Users absolutely *love* to customize their user experience. Windows
> Wallpaper, WindowBlinds, WinAmp skins, Firefox, Chrome, etc, etc - give a
> geek an API to the UI and they're off to the races.
>
> So the Visual Studio team thought it would be a bright idea to make VS
> completely bland and uncustomizable?
>
> I truly worry about the culture at Microsoft - it really feels like
> they've lost sight of the community sometimes.
>
> Philo ****
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Anna-Jayne Metcalfe
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 2:44 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted? ****
>
> Hi ,
>
> > That's old news, and was updated in the final release to be a
> better-looking alternative that what was seen in April.
>
> I tend to think of it as “slightly less worse looking than the beta”. If
> UserVoice and other forums are anything to go by the calls for further
> change (e.g. a complete reversion to the style of its predecessor) don’t
> seem to have abated either.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anna ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
>  
>