Re: Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?
Mike <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:43:34 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.off-topic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALct8TH-CGnHNeB_vAnvKbHDptYqw=iQjSYPCeQ0-dPgkNk4DA@mail.gmail.com> |
I happen to like the spare, texty look of Windows 8, which VS 2012 exemplifies. Or at least, don't dislike it. Am I the silent majority? Who knows. Let's at least give it time. And if it is indeed significantly faster, then I don't care what it looks like, I'm happy! Just about every server I go on has been set back to "classic mode". If no one ever pushed us, we'd still be running Windows 3.0, I'm sure. Mike On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Chris Sells <csells-MTuqIxyGj3nAKuVPhbf8BAC/[email protected]>wrote: > ** > > > lol**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Philo Janus > *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 7:27 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?**** > > ** ** > > **** > > I’m pretty sure Azure is a collection of WordPress plugins… [just kidding] > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chris Sells > *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:03 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?**** > > **** > > > > > > **** > > Essentially the client-side of the company (Windows and Office) likes C++, > whereas the server-side of the company (ASP.NET) likes C#. I’m unsure > about the cloud size (Azure).**** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Curt > Hagenlocher > *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 6:48 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?**** > > **** > > **** > > Wait, what? VS2012 does not have less managed code than VS2010.**** > > **** > > It's a mistake to think of Microsoft as monolithic with respect to > something like this. There are large parts of the company with a heavy > investment in C#, and that's simply not going to change. For that matter, > the C# compiler is being rewritten from C++ to C#. To a great extent, the > recent re-emphasis on C++ inside the company is being driven by Windows, > which**** > > **** > > 1) is concerned about being able to run efficiently on low-power devices > like phones and tablets. > 2) was burnt badly by managed code in the Longhorn era**** > > > **** > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Alan Baljeu <alanbaljeu-/[email protected]> wrote: > **** > > **** > > I should add that C# can be used to make COM components, and it's much > easier with C# than C++ even if you are an experienced C++ developer. *** > * > > **** > > Also, check the stats. C++ is growing, not dying. Even Microsoft has > switched to C++ after going heavy .net. VS2010 is slow because it was made > in .net, and VS2012 is fast because it was made in C++.**** > > **** > > Alan Baljeu**** > > * ***** > > *From: Alan Baljeu <alanbaljeu-/[email protected]>***** > > *To:* "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:07:25 AM**** > > > *Subject:* Re: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?**** > > **** > > **** > > C++ sense was never as good as C# IntelliSense. I suggest looking at > VisualAssist.**** > > **** > > Alan Baljeu**** > > **** > > *From: Stoyan Damov <[email protected]>***** > > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:47:59 AM > *Subject:* Re: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted?**** > > **** > > **** > > One almost unrelated question, but this is the OT list, so :) Would > Microsoft implement IntelliSense for C++ or this has already been done? I > understand there aren't so many C++ developers these days (and I'm not an > every day one either) but every now and then I have to create this or that > COM component (yeah... :() and VS2010 drives me mad, especially since I'm > so used to Resharper and IntelliJ Idea which both beat IntelliSense... > > Thanks, > Stoyan**** > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Philo Janus <[email protected]> wrote:* > *** > > **** > > The part that baffles me - fifteen years of software have shown us that > Power Users absolutely *love* to customize their user experience. Windows > Wallpaper, WindowBlinds, WinAmp skins, Firefox, Chrome, etc, etc - give a > geek an API to the UI and they're off to the races. > > So the Visual Studio team thought it would be a bright idea to make VS > completely bland and uncustomizable? > > I truly worry about the culture at Microsoft - it really feels like > they've lost sight of the community sometimes. > > Philo **** > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Anna-Jayne Metcalfe > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 2:44 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [OT] Windows 8: how quickly will it be adopted? **** > > Hi , > > > That's old news, and was updated in the final release to be a > better-looking alternative that what was seen in April. > > I tend to think of it as “slightly less worse looking than the beta”. If > UserVoice and other forums are anything to go by the calls for further > change (e.g. a complete reversion to the style of its predecessor) don’t > seem to have abated either. > > > Cheers, > > Anna **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > > > > > **** > > **** > > >