Re: [litestep] A theory about the decreasing popularity

Brian Wolven <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Arve Barsnes wrote:
> Personally, I think that a lot of the people who would otherwise love
> to tinkle with LiteStep to make a fun/effective/whathaveyou
> personalized desktop have gotten tired of Microsoft, and taking their
> tweaking all the way with a linux system. I know I have. Seems to me
> like that is a trend that is only going to continue, with Vista
> getting such poor reviews across the board (from what I've read
> anyway)

Or perhaps they are using WinXP (but only with LS), Ubuntu, *and* OS X, 
with MacPorts or Fink installed so that they can use all that lovely 
linux and BSD-developed software on the Mac. =)

I still don't think anything matches LS on XP for stability and 
customizability. Eventually I *might* get the Macbook tweaked up to 
something near LS standards, but it'll be a while, and it won't all be 
done with free software. I'd prefer Gnome, KDE or LS to the OS X dock 
and the finder bar. Although I've been able to reproduce much of the 
functionality I had with LS, it doesn't all fit together nearly as well 
as a good LS theme does.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.