Re: [litestep] A theory about the decreasing popularity
Brian Wolven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arve Barsnes wrote:
> Personally, I think that a lot of the people who would otherwise love
> to tinkle with LiteStep to make a fun/effective/whathaveyou
> personalized desktop have gotten tired of Microsoft, and taking their
> tweaking all the way with a linux system. I know I have. Seems to me
> like that is a trend that is only going to continue, with Vista
> getting such poor reviews across the board (from what I've read
> anyway)
Or perhaps they are using WinXP (but only with LS), Ubuntu, *and* OS X,
with MacPorts or Fink installed so that they can use all that lovely
linux and BSD-developed software on the Mac. =)
I still don't think anything matches LS on XP for stability and
customizability. Eventually I *might* get the Macbook tweaked up to
something near LS standards, but it'll be a while, and it won't all be
done with free software. I'd prefer Gnome, KDE or LS to the OS X dock
and the finder bar. Although I've been able to reproduce much of the
functionality I had with LS, it doesn't all fit together nearly as well
as a good LS theme does.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org