Re: [litestep] A theory about the decreasing popularity

"Jon Vanderwoude" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep
Message-ID <[email protected]>
chalk up another former litestep user who is right now using linux.

And as stated else where, the thing I miss most about windows at home
is litestep, and I can't use litestep at work because I need to have
my machine working like the "clients" machines...  so it's fluxbox at
home, and explorer at work.  But I do miss my theme with every thing
tucked away to neat and tight, none of this 64x64 "dock apps" crap
that I'm forced into now, so tacky and static....

I think it is a irronic story, that litestep started out to mimic a
unix gui in windows, and grew so much beyond that, but now all of the
windows users who used litestep because they liked to tinker have
moved to a *nix based system... remarkable how that wheel turns.

On 8/14/07, Joshua Blocher <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm going to have to second this thought. I have been using Linux
> happily for a couple of years now.
>
> That said I have a lot more stuff I have the option to tweak in Linux.
> The Desktop Environments I have looked at are no where near as
> customizable as LS and that's only 3 (have to look into e17 still).
>
> I have given up on windows as a platform that suits my needs
> I have said it before that LiteStep is the only thing I miss from Windows.
> Other than that Perfectly happy using what I have got.
>
> Gnome, Beryl/Compiz Fusion, etc . . . and the freedom to hack the code
> of anything on my system.
>
> Joshua L. Blocher
> verbalshadow
>
> On 8/14/07, Arve Barsnes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Personally, I think that a lot of the people who would otherwise love
> > to tinkle with LiteStep to make a fun/effective/whathaveyou
> > personalized desktop have gotten tired of Microsoft, and taking their
> > tweaking all the way with a linux system. I know I have. Seems to me
> > like that is a trend that is only going to continue, with Vista
> > getting such poor reviews across the board (from what I've read
> > anyway)
> >
> > To continue using LiteStep though, all I'd need was the assurance that
> > it would play nice with Eclipse, as I'm still using Windows at work.
> >
> > I really like Roy's suggestion for a Firefox themed desktop though!
> >
> > On 8/14/07, Roy Gathercoal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > (please forgive me if this ends up being a duplicate. For some reason my
> > > first effort just disappeared. . .no smoke, no error message, just nothing.)
> > >
> > > It might be that the rising popularity of the internet is responsible
> > > for some of our perceptions that LiteStep has declined. I would probably
> > > have to put "desire to spend time gaming/chatting/working on computer
> > > and less desire to play with the screen itself" high on the list.
> > >
> > > It might also be that other customizing platforms have grown at
> > > LiteStep's expense. And perhaps people believed there is a much steeper
> > > learning curve than there really is to start using LiteStep--
> > >
> > > On the other hand, OpenOffice and Thunderbird--both applications not
> > > running from a browser seem to have grown tremendously in the last
> > > couple of years. Sites/programs such as AVS anti-virus, Spybot and
> > > Roboform seem to be doing well which would suggest that there isn't a
> > > shortage of users willing to trust their safety to open source (or at
> > > least free-to-use-at-home) programs.
> > >
> > > So I guess I don't know which are likely. I certainly wouldn't discard
> > > the possibility that fewer users--especially fewer users who are
> > > comfortable digging into their computers--might be spending the bulk of
> > > their time online.
> > >
> > > Which does remind me. Has anyone thought about creating a theme that
> > > would take the look and feel of firefox all the way to the boot? I would
> > > love to see a theme that brought some of the tools I use often on the
> > > web to my desktop. Facilities such as pie menus, bookmarked pages, tabs
> > > (especially the ability to preview a thumbnail before loading), and
> > > really quick access to resources (such as Wikipedia, and various other
> > > dictionary/thesaurus/special use dictionaries)?
> > >
> > > That might attract some attention. . .
> > >
> > > Fractal Design wrote:
> > > > So we all know that Litestep is losing users, and is not nearly as popular
> > > > as it once was.
> > > >
> > > > I would like to state for the record that I think this is due to the
> > > > internet, and the web 2.0 stuffs going on.
> > > > Take for instance the web browser: firefox.
> > > > Firefox is another open source effort.
> > > >
> > > > If people used their computers (eg word, office) more than their browser (eg
> > > > google, wikipedia)
> > > > then Litestep, an open source shell should be more popular than firefox.
> > > >
> > > > Think about it. Web browsing is 1 capability of an OS. Litestep basically
> > > > skins the shell of that OS.
> > > > How is litestep losing popularity?
> > > >
> > > > Its because people are using their browsers far more than any other function
> > > > of a computer.
> > > >
> > > > As an example, with tabbed browsing, people dont need/require/want a VWM
> > > > anymore. Its not that big of a deal anymore.
> > > >
> > > > P.S.
> > > > Just a theory, no data was collected to form these opinions or anything.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >     Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
> > >         LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
> > >             Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
> >        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
> >            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
>         LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
>             Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.