Re: LS development

i run litestep on 64 bit win7, the latest alpha seems to run "ok", the
two problems i've encountered are:
    - The system icons in the taskbar are visible but not operational
(previous versions of ls they were not even present)
    - It tends to crash sometimes, requiring me to ctrl + alt + del
and run it again, seems to crash on startup all the time now though it
didn't always.

2010/10/27 Bj=F6rn Brembs <[email protected]>:
> Tobbe Lundberg wrote:
>
>>> Is it safe to assume that LS is now finally
>>> deceased and dead for good?
>
>> Absolutely not!
>
> This is great news!
>
> What's the current state of affairs regarding 64
> bit windows 7? What would happen if I installed
> the latest alpha on win7(64)?
>
> It was said here that the modules (some? all?)
> would not work?
>
> How much work would it be to port (assuming one
> could get a hold of the source) a module to make
> it 64-bit compatible?
> I'm thinking of trying to pay someone to port the
> modules I use...
>
> Thanks a lot, you made my day - in the last 10
> years, I have become so dependent on LS, it's not
> even funny anymore!
>
> Bjoern
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bj=F6rn Brembs
> ---------------------------------------------
> http://brembs.net
> Neurobiology
> Freie Universit=E4t Berlin
> Germany
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> =A0 =A0Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org