Re: LS development

Tobbe Lundberg wrote:

>> Is it safe to assume that LS is now finally
>> deceased and dead for good?

> Absolutely not!

This is great news!

What's the current state of affairs regarding 64
bit windows 7? What would happen if I installed
the latest alpha on win7(64)?

It was said here that the modules (some? all?)
would not work?

How much work would it be to port (assuming one
could get a hold of the source) a module to make
it 64-bit compatible?
I'm thinking of trying to pay someone to port the
modules I use...

Thanks a lot, you made my day - in the last 10
years, I have become so dependent on LS, it's not
even funny anymore!

Bjoern





--=20
Bj=F6rn Brembs
---------------------------------------------
http://brembs.net
Neurobiology
Freie Universit=E4t Berlin
Germany


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org