Re: Is this a bug I see before my eyes?

Hi Nenad,
> Well, I still remember why I wrote it that way :-)
I'm please about that. I seldom can these days.

> Form the experience with MFC - people would too much stuff in OnIdle and
> spin it too often, which would result in sluggish apps. Default
> implementation in WTL doesn't allow idle processing to continue to prevent
> that. If you want to be able to continue idle processing, you can create
> your own Module class, and override OnIdle with implementation which takes
> return value into account.
> 
I can see the reasoning behind that, but was it justified in the light
of the WTL interface being so close to MFC? I wouldn't want to make a
big issue out of this, as the WTL is such a well respected component of
the Windows/C++ environment.

As more of an aside---it just seems odd that the decision of how
to use the OnIdle facility should be moved away from the application
developer, to the tool (yes I know the developer can subvert that
decision). It's almost as if you didn't trust the developers as a body.

We used to have a government that didn't like the way a tiny minority
might risk harming themselves, doing some particular activity, so they
tried to make it difficult for the whole electorate to do that activity, 
or even banned it. They got kicked out at the last election. :-)

Thanks to your efforts, WTL is too valuable a tool to let that happen.
'Nuff said!

-- 
Rob Marsden
Gistix (Northern) Limited


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtl/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtl/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/