Re: GL problems

David Dawes <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:19:33PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>David Dawes dixit:
>
>>Another useful data point might be a delay loop in place of the usleep().
>
>I was going to try that today, replacing the call usleep in the .s
>file with a simple delay loop, but checked first if it still failed
>without, and it worked without the usleep workaround.
>
>What did I change? I lowered the default cflags from -march=pentium
>to -march=i486 (to fix another miscompile in ppp(8)) and rebuilt the
>whole system (just playing with cflags in X had not helped earlier).
>
>I'm surprised, but thankfully it "looks like" a gcc optimisation bug.
>Thanks for the help, though.

That's interesting.

>Sad: now 108.000 fps instead of 115.200 fps :(
>
>
>By the way, you wanted to provisionally commit my decompress.c,
>I hope you didn't forget?

I didn't forget.  I'll commit it soon.

David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.