Re: Discussing issues

Leon Shiman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:22:42 -0400 G A Economou wrote:
>Subject: Re: [forum] Discussing issues
>
>On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:11:38 -0400, Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 12:46:57PM -0400, David Wexelblat wrote:
>>> If Keith had just resigned from the Core Team, gone off and done some 
>>> stuff,
>>> told some people about it, etc, the free market would have taken care of
>>> itself. I believe this is the point David, Alan, Mark, a couple of 
>>> others,
>>> have tried to make.
>>>
>>> This whole governance thing is a smokescreen, IMHO.
>>
>> So I'd personally like to move past who did what and who is the jerk,
>> and simply ask how we are going to ship an X server in the next year
>> or so and then regularly after that, which both contains new
>> innovations/APIs/features and has good drivers and
>> stability/release-process. What is our X implementation going forward,
>> and how do we make it good. How do we coordinate all the interests
>> here in a way that creates critical mass and a powerful development
>> engine.
>>
>> The reason Keith matters in all this is that there is this long list
>> of code next to his name. In practice, if he's gone then so is this
>> long list of important contributions.
>>
>> Now I'm sure someone is going to follow up and say well that's Keith's
>> fault, but here is the thing: I don't care whose fault it is, I just
>> don't want to be screwed by having to choose between the drivers and
>> the features.
>>
>> Can't someone in the room be the bigger man so to speak, stand up and
>> fix the problem.
>>
>> And then as a side note, why don't we address the X.org relationship
>> while we're at it, and just get X cleaned up and fixed as a whole.
>
>And you Havoc have this power to speak for X.org.  To make things happen
>there?  I mean, you guys can talk all day and make divisions all you want,
>but unless someone on the other side can bring it home, this whole 
>discussion
>is meaningless.

Speaking for myself, also an active member of X.Org, let me assure you that 
I am paying very close attention to this debate. I want to know how X.Org 
can be effective going forward.

Leon 

>
>Georgina
>_______________________________________________
>Forum mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.