Re: Discussing issues

Havoc Pennington writes:
 > On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 03:18:56PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
 > > >> >Let me be crystal clear: this is NOT a favorable outcome while I'm
 > > >> >wearing any of my hats, from Red Hat to freedesktop.org to just plain
 > > >> >old Havoc.
 > > >> 
 > > >> And neither is any outcome that disenfranchises those XFree86
 > > >> developers with the most time and effort invested in XFree86 itself.
 > > >> 
 > > >
 > > >Great, so let's design a third outcome.
 > > >
 > > >Strawman proposal: we create a fairly open infrastructure/process
 > > 
 > > I guess you really don't get it.  Improved communication/dialogue
 > > somehow got morphed into a whole new infrastructure and bureaucratic
 > > process?  You're joking, right?
 > 
 > I don't understand. In what I proposed, you would make a release with
 > the same group you do now, using the same process you do now.
 > 
 > What is the new bureaucracy that I proposed?
 > 

What we probably haven't  realized immediately: a lot of the
structures you were talking about are already in place
for XFree86. However - to get a clearer picture what
is all required - you list all the structures to make
sure the other groups realize what is required.

Egbert.