Re: Move X definition to IETF?

On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 21:52, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:36:13PM +0100, Toplica Tanaskovic wrote:
> > 	From my end-user point of view, I think X is good but slow. Some people will 
> > say but you have remote this ability, remote that... Face it guys, over 75% 
> > of users doesn't even know of such possibility, of the 25% who know half of 
> > them have no need of such a thing.
> 
> How many times do we have to say it:
> 
>  The remote nature of X almost never shows up in our profiles of 
>  real-world toolkits, desktops, and apps.

This might be, but the protocol is a very high barrier for new
developers to experiment with how the X11 windowing system works and
interacts with applications.

-- 
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]>