Re: cooperation with ISO
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 06:18:29PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > > ISO is currently starting up a study group on Linux > > and related technologies, to see if there are any areas > > that could be standardized thru ISO. > > Do we really need ISO in the way. ISO's way of working > doesn't exactly fit up with the Linux one. My experiences > of ISO have been in the telco end of the world but they > haven't been inspiring. My experiences with ISO has been quite good, and I do not think they are exceptionally slow. > X.org seem to want to prove they can deliver. I've a lot > more faith in them than ISO. It is not that they should take over that process of standardizing X, but rather a cooperation. For example the current standardization of POSIX was done as a cooperation between IEEE, The Open Group and ISO. A lot of core Linux technology is standardized by ISO, eg the POSIX kernel, the POSIX utilities, C and C++, and the character sets. My idea was to standardize the core X APIs - which have been stable for many years. It was not the idea initially to standardize new APIs, though that could come later. best regards keld