Re: cooperation with ISO

Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 06:18:29PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> > ISO is currently starting up a study group on Linux
> > and related technologies, to see if there are any areas
> > that could be standardized thru ISO. 
> 
> Do we really need ISO in the way. ISO's way of working
> doesn't exactly fit up with the Linux one. My experiences
> of ISO have been in the telco end of the world but they
> haven't been inspiring.

My experiences with ISO has been quite good, and I do not
think they are exceptionally slow. 

> X.org seem to want to prove they can deliver. I've a lot
> more faith in them than ISO.

It is not that they should take over that process of
standardizing X, but rather a cooperation. For example
the current standardization of POSIX was done as a cooperation
between IEEE, The Open Group and ISO.

A lot of core Linux technology is standardized by ISO,
eg the POSIX kernel, the POSIX utilities, C and C++,
and the character sets. 

My idea was to standardize the core X APIs - which have
been stable for many years. It was not the idea initially
to standardize new APIs, though that could come later.

best regards
keld
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.