Re: About our effort at NoMachine
rudy BERRY <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1048704070.10890.528.camel@yopyop> |
2) bandwidth usage for client side fonts is about the same as
with server side fonts, as expected, even with no code to compress the glyphs.
Compressing glyphs (or the entire protocol stream) would be a serious win.
Like the apache gzip module does with the http streams ?
by this way, yes , it could be a real win . Note that i think it could
be implemented in the actual versions of Xfree . As a replacement for
the LBX extension . Network performance should certainly gain in
performance with this type of solution . Anyway, i'm not a developper so
i can't speak anymore ...
i still keep an eye on this forum to know what's going with the Xfree
technology and perahps bring an idea .
friendly,
--==::. paparoot .::==--