Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org

Vadim Plessky <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday 31 March 2003 02:44, Ben Jansens wrote:
|  On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:21:46PM +0400, Vadim Plessky wrote:
|  > On Sunday 30 March 2003 21:23, Havoc Pennington wrote:
|  > |  On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:42:12AM +0400, Vadim Plessky wrote:
|  > |  > I mean, we should make it clear:  either you commit yourself to
|  > |  > implementing all necessary extensions (not only Render, but
|  > |  > Xr/Xc/RandR as well) to X on a timely basis, or we do not allow you
|  > |  > to participate in further development of standards.
|  > |
|  > |  There's plenty of incentive to ship the standard without having silly
|  > |  rules like that. Lots of software such as GNOME and KDE will use
|  > |  standard features, so everyone will have plenty of incentive to ship
|  > |  the standard features. You don't need incentive beyond that. If part
|  > |  of the standard genuinely offers no value, there's no reason to
|  > |  require people to follow it.
|  >
|  > I think we have following points in our discussions:
|  > * what is the current standard(s)
|
|  There is confusion over what the current standards are?

What do you mean here?  You think that we have working standards?

|
|  > * who decides what is going in and what - not
|  > * what features are necessary (in XFree86) to build successfull Linux
|  > (UNIX) Desktop?
|  >
|  > If there is a nice standard - than no doubt, both GNOME and KDE would
|  > pick it up.
|  > But what would happen if there is no common standard?..
|
|  I'm sorry but exactly what kind of standard is required here? And to what
|  end? To replace GTK and QT with a single implementation? QT is developed
| by TrollTech with further goals than simply an Xlib toolkit, and probably
| different goals from GTK. What I think you are suggesting seems irrational.

As an example, I take FontConfig, RENDER, Xft, FreeType in the basement, etc.
I also hope Xr/Xc/Xsvg would be adopted among those toolkits n the future.

I also think that I haven't mentioned idea of joining Qt and GTK.
Some developers have to grow up first before this happens.

|
|
|  Ben

-- 
Best Regards,

Vadim Plessky
SVG Icons * BlueSphere Icons 0.3.0 released
http://svgicons.sourceforge.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.