Re: Re: Possible WM Documentation Project
Alfredo Kengi Kojima <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You don't need CVS access to get documentation into releases. Documentation should stay in a separate CVS tree. -- Alfredo On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Alex Perez wrote: > Alfredo Kengi Kojima wrote: >> >> Why is CVS access needed for a documentation project? > > Seriously? > >> And besides, we'll be migrating soon to another scm, probably svn. > > Because if the documentation is not in the tarball with the rest of the app, > a fraction of people who otherwise would will ever see it. At least svn would > allow us to get past CVS' very crappy (lack of) permission > granularity...you'll be able to give people commit access just to any single > given directory (Documentation, for example) >> >> -- >> Alfredo >> >> >> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Peter Dembinski wrote: >> >>> I heard there were similar problems with Polish(ed) Linux Distribution. >>> The leader ceased write CVS access or something like that and the project >>> stagnated, there were internal fights etc. >>> >>> Generally, other developers got rid of leader and introduced more >>> democratic >>> project management principles. PLD still doesn't strive, despite of >>> procedures involved, so this solution may be questionable. >>> >>> You may always consult PLD developers (http://www.pld-linux.org) in order >>> of getting a clue of what you can do about stubborn project leader :) > > _______________________________________________ > INFO: https://windowmaker.org/lists/listinfo/wm-user > ARCHIVE: https://windowmaker.org/lists/archive/wm-user/ > FAQ: http://windowmaker.org/faq.html > _______________________________________________ INFO: https://windowmaker.org/lists/listinfo/wm-user ARCHIVE: https://windowmaker.org/lists/archive/wm-user/ FAQ: http://windowmaker.org/faq.html