Re: Re: Ultralight synthetic base layer

Segraves <andrews9000-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.backpacking.light
Message-ID <[email protected]>
PS - For those who didn't already know the weights, that's 6.4 oz for both tops and bottoms of the silks, and 10-14 oz for the synthetics.

Bill

> Patagonia
> silkweight looks like a candidate, but it seems not to be
> stocked too many places (maybe they're transitioning to a
> new one?), especially the non-stretch version. Specs show
> the non-stretch at a bit over 10 oz, vs. 6.4 for my silks,
> and the stretch pair over 14.  Trade-off, I guess -
> faster drying synthetic vs lighter weight of silk.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.