Re: Re: Tyvek ground cloth [2 Attachments]
John Ladd <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:04:07 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.backpacking.light |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABr5Ysr1WhpHTJUvc63N03YnqA=gubkJP59dEvrg-_T0-M+WiA@mail.gmail.com> |
I just got a sample of Tyvek 1460, which is a cloth-type Tyvek without the surface treatments that reduce hydrostatic head rating for water penetration (1460 exceeds 50). It's available by the yard at Quest Outfitters. http://questoutfitters.com/uncoated_fabrics.htm#TYVEK I have *not* field tested it yet. Quest also carries the 1443R, which is a bit lighter, but has Corona treatment that reduces the hydrostatic head rating considerably (from over 50 to under 15). I have used this (from a kite distributor) in the field and found it quite useful. I got the 1460 on a search for a version that was similarly useful but had a higher rating for water repellency. There's also a promising grade Tyvek14M, lighter than 1460, but more water repellant than the 1443R. It is also not Corona treated (so hydrostatic head over 50). I am hopeful that it may combine the light weight of the 1443R with the water repellency of the 1460. So far I've seen it sold only in bulk (60 inches by 10 yards and larger) http://www.materialconcepts.com/store/products/60-x-10-yard-tyvek-14m It may, apparently, be available by the yard at distributors of fine art packaging materials. But I haven't found them yet. I have not field-tested either 1460 or 14M, but I now have both, and will try to test them this summer. I attach spec sheets for 1460 and some information about 14M. I've been told that the 14M also has a 50 rating for hydrostatic pressure and it's about 40% lighter than the 1460, on my scale. The supplier who sent me a sample has offered to distribute it through Quest Outfitters if there's a demand for it. John Curran Ladd 1616 Castro Street San Francisco, CA 94114-3707 415-648-9279 On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:05 PM, jrwooden <jim-TZ6VOGY/[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > > > yes ... that is the same chart I was looking at ... > > Type 10 – Is the stiff smooth paper-like stuff for printing/packaging > applications so crunchy... so less than ideal... > > Type 16 – perforated for high air permeability so seems a bad plan... > > Type 14 – softer fabric-like series, and OF THE 14xx series the 1422A is > the only one with the hydrostatic head rating...so that's where I was > thinking of going........... > > I had an e-mail exchange a while back with Dupont on the topic, but the > agent I was working with could not really get his head around the > ground-cloth application ;-/ > > > Jim >