Re: [Ebbc-Talk] rear red bike light: blinking or steady?
Michael Graff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.bicycle.ebbc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANe0fGVQVKC4kJtMM1TtQiAp83gSgcmx-7UhmYBsCBFHxy9WFw@mail.gmail.com> |
I have heard that flashing lights make it harder to detect where the light is located (e.g. how far away it is, or how quickly you're approaching it). I split the difference: steady lights on the bike, flashing lights on the helmet, and some yellow Reflexite tape as well. On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Jym Dyer <jym-RQ31L/[email protected]> wrote: > =v= I've seen mention of this before, but never knew quite > what to make of it. I'd like to see research that takes other > variables into account*, such as the blink rate, the brightness > of the lights, the patterns some of them make, etc. > > =v= For my own part, I use a blinky that blinks, bright but not > blinding. Plus bits of reflective tape that to my eyes are even > more visible in the headlights. > <_Jym_> > > ________________________________________________________________ > * Oh no, there he goes again with the sociology jargon. > > _______________________________________________ > Ebbc-Talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org > _______________________________________________ Ebbc-Talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org