Re: [Ebbc-Talk] rear red bike light: blinking or steady?

Michael Graff <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.bicycle.ebbc
Message-ID <CANe0fGVQVKC4kJtMM1TtQiAp83gSgcmx-7UhmYBsCBFHxy9WFw@mail.gmail.com>
I have heard that flashing lights make it harder to detect where the light
is located (e.g. how far away it is, or how quickly you're approaching it).

I split the difference: steady lights on the bike, flashing lights on the
helmet, and some yellow Reflexite tape as well.

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Jym Dyer <jym-RQ31L/[email protected]> wrote:

> =v= I've seen mention of this before, but never knew quite
> what to make of it.  I'd like to see research that takes other
> variables into account*, such as the blink rate, the brightness
> of the lights, the patterns some of them make, etc.
>
> =v= For my own part, I use a blinky that blinks, bright but not
> blinding.  Plus bits of reflective tape that to my eyes are even
> more visible in the headlights.
>    <_Jym_>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> * Oh no, there he goes again with the sociology jargon.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ebbc-Talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org
>
_______________________________________________
Ebbc-Talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.