Re: [Ebbc-Talk] In Bike-Friendly Copenhagen, Highways For Cyclists
Bob Shanteau <[email protected]> Sun, 02 Sep 2012 09:36:00 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.bicycle.ebbc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A superhighway by definition is an uninterrupted flow facility, such as a freeway or motorway. A conventional city street with traffic signals is an interrupted flow facility, so calling a bike lane with some priority features on such a street a "superhighway" is misleading. Bob Shanteau On 9/2/2012 8:53 AM, Mike Jones wrote: > London already has Cycling Super Highways, and I rode one (CS7) this summer. > http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/cycling/11901.aspx > > Like the ones planned for Copenhagen they follow the main roads for faster > and more direct routes (think Collage Ave, not even Telegraph). They > couldn't be built here in US they're too much of a compromise! Outside peak > hours trucks and other delivery vehicles can be parked in them (limited > spots and times), and at all times they are shared with buses. All the same, > the one I took largely worked. The blue colored route clearly shows you the > way, but you don't have to ride in it; and with a truck parked in it you > cannot. Strategic, sections of bike-lanes and bike boxes at signals give > bikes an advantage, but sharing is the name of the game. The only place the > system really fails is at the large multi-laned roundabouts- this just > aren't meant for bikes and critics say the system is making cyclists think > otherwise- with fatal results. > > Mike _______________________________________________ Ebbc-Talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org