Re: [Ebbc-Talk] One-Way Streets: Do Humans Really Think?!
Emily Thurston <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:54:44 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.bicycle.ebbc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My experience with all the one way streets in downtown Portland, Oregon, is that they were GREAT for bicycles. They simplify traffic a great deal and make it easier for bicycles, which move slower and steer differently than the cars, to navigate intersections safely. In particular, turning left off a busy street works much better. I lived in Portland, OR for 9 years as the bicycle traffic tripled from 1% of transportation trips to 3% of transportation trips. Bicycling has tripled again since I moved to the bay area. The one way streets in and around Downtown remain. One added benefit of one-way streets is that it's easier to get the lights timed. In downtown Portland they were timed at 15 mph, which is a great speed for cycling. On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:40 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 10:15:54 -0700 > From: Mike Vandeman <mjvande-yBeKhBN/[email protected]> > To: Recipient list suppressed:; > Subject: [Ebbc-Talk] One-Way Streets: Do Humans Really Think?! > Message-ID: <810347.49699.bm-lZTCTkxaLTf8AbloPCyspULUdxTIq2jXG6kzb5Gsg2M@public.gmane.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > It's really not rocket science. If there are no one-way streets, one > can always get where one wants to go via the shortest route, saving > gas and reducing accidents and global warming (assuming that you are > one of those dinosaurs still using motor vehicles). Once you > introduce one-way streets, you will often have to drive farther than > the shortest route. For a simple example, say you are at one end of a > one-way street and want to get to somewhere else on that street. > > While we are on the subject of traffic, have you noticed how many > residents have eliminated their off-street parking space, and forced > the city to provide them on-street parking at a ridiculously low > below-market price? On-street parking -- at least on arterials -- > should be eliminated. Instead, those lanes should be for the > exclusive use of bicyclists and emergency vehicles. That would > provide bicyclists a safe place to ride, and provide ambulances a way > to get through when the traffic lanes are full of cars. > > Then we could solve the homelessness problem by using the parking > lane on non-arterials for old cars that no longer run, to be used as > housing for the homeless. They could have a safe, dry place to sleep > and lock up their belongings. > > There! The world's major problems solved in only three paragraphs! > Now get to work! _______________________________________________ Ebbc-Talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org