Re: [Ebbc-Talk] One-Way Streets: Do Humans Really Think?!
Mike Jones <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:53:01 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.bicycle.ebbc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANOw43yuOwcmjy5GH_RxQ9QkoxzpBzK5hS8JF_SyZ0MYpKmNbg@mail.gmail.com> |
I've found it just confuses them....... On Oct 22, 2012 9:50 PM, "Kevin Dalley" <[email protected]> wrote: > Legally, you are allowed to ride on left, but drivers may curse at you. > > > Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> At last night's Oakland BPAC meeting, the consensus was that a right-side >> bike lane, on a one-way street, does not preclude you from riding on the far >> left. RideOn. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Vandeman >> Sent: 18 October 2012 07:34 >> To: Emily Thurston; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Ebbc-Talk] One-Way Streets: Do Humans Really Think?! >> >> At 08:54 AM 10/15/2012, Emily Thurston wrote: >> >>> My experience with all the one way streets in downtown Portland, >>> Oregon, is that they were GREAT for bicycles. They simplify traffic a >>> great deal and make it easier for bicycles, which move slower and steer >>> differently than the cars, to navigate intersections safely. >>> In particular, turning left off a busy street works much better. >> >> >> One-way streets probably increase the speed of motor vehicles, making them >> more dangerous for bicyclists. In general, it's vastly more pleasant to ride >> side streets where there's minimal traffic. >> >> I lived in Portland, OR for 9 years as the bicycle traffic tripled from >>> 1% of transportation trips to 3% of transportation trips. >>> Bicycling has tripled again since I moved to the bay area. The one way >>> streets in and around Downtown remain. >>> >>> One added benefit of one-way streets is that it's easier to get the >>> lights timed. In downtown Portland they were timed at 15 mph, which is >>> a great speed for cycling. >> >> >> There's no way to time lights to please >> everyone. Instead, we should program >> lights to respond, first of all, to the presence of bicyclists, buses, and >> emergency vehicles, and only respond to other vehicles when none of the >> former are present. >> >> But, as I said, side streets (preferably without lights) are far better. And >> the air is cleaner. And whenever you meet cross traffic, you can hop off and >> become a pedestrian, with the right of way. >> >> On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:40 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> Message: 1 >>>> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 10:15:54 -0700 >>>> From: Mike Vandeman <mjvande-yBeKhBN/[email protected]> >>>> To: Recipient list suppressed:; >>>> Subject: [Ebbc-Talk] One-Way Streets: Do Humans Really Think?! >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <810347.49699.bm-lZTCTkxaLTf8AbloPCyspULUdxTIq2jXG6kzb5Gsg2M@public.gmane.org> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed >>>> >>>> It's really not rocket science. If there are no one-way streets, one >>>> can always get where one wants to go via the shortest route, saving >>>> gas and reducing accidents and global warming (assuming that you are >>>> one of those dinosaurs still using motor vehicles). Once you >>>> introduce one-way streets, you will often have to drive farther than >>>> the shortest route. For a simple example, say you are at one end of >>>> a one-way street and want to get to somewhere else on that street. >>>> >>>> While we are on the subject of traffic, have you noticed how many >>>> residents have eliminated their off-street parking space, and forced >>>> the city to provide them on-street parking at a ridiculously low >>>> below-market price? On-street parking -- at least on arterials -- >>>> should be eliminated. >>>> Instead, those lanes should be for the >>>> exclusive use of bicyclists and emergency vehicles. That would >>>> provide bicyclists a safe place to ride, and provide ambulances a >>>> way to get through when the traffic lanes are full of cars. >>>> >>>> Then we could solve the homelessness problem by using the parking >>>> lane on non-arterials for old cars that no longer run, to be used as >>>> housing for the homeless. They could have a safe, dry place to sleep >>>> and lock up their belongings. >>>> >>>> There! The world's major problems solved in only three paragraphs! >>>> Now get to work! >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Ebbc-Talk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ Ebbc-Talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ebbc.org/listinfo.cgi/ebbc-talk-ebbc.org